This order notes the withdrawal of the application by learned counsel for the applicant. Consequently, the office action was dismissed.
The office action was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Office action taken with data
| DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA | |
|---|---|
| Date o'P"order or proceeding |
Order with the Signature of the Court |
| OA 388 of2022 | |
| 06.02.2023 | Ld. counsel for the applicant has informed that the account of defendants has closed under the OTS and he seeks permission to withdraw the case. Accordingly the OA is dismissed as withdrawn. Consign the record. |
| Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. Patna V (Kaushalendra Yadav Presiding Officer |
Applicant
Kaushalendra Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
