The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed applicant Bank of India's Original Application No. 376/2022 because no representation was made by the bank despite repeated notices.
Original Application No.376/2022 stands dismissed; file consigned to the record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 20.09. Sr. No |
20223 .43 OA No. 376/2022 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 376/2022 | ||
| Bank of India ..Applicant Versus Arvind Pandharinath Shelke ..Defendant None for the applicant-bank. None for the defendant. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. In this matter since long nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant bank. None appears today also. 2. Even after passed over none appears for the applicant bank. It appears that the applicant bank is not interested in pursuing the matter. |
||
| 3. In view of this, the Original Application |
||
| No.376/2022 shall be dismissed. 4. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. Original Application No.376/2022 stands dismissed. B. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (OA No.376/2022) Page 1 of 1
Bank of India
Arvind Pandharinath Shelke
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
