Disposed
Bank of Baroda v. K R Thakur
DRTOA/374/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 20/01/2023 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in OA 374 of 2022 Bank of Baroda Vs K R Thakur |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate for applicant is present. Advocate for defendant is present. Ld. Counsel for the Applicant submits that the CIRP has been appointed for the contesting Defendants by the Hon’ble NCLT. Since, CIRP is already appointed by the Hon’ble NCLT therefore, there is no substance to continue the present OA, the moratorium would be applicable in the present matter, thus, present OA is hereby disposed off with the liberty to the Applicant to revive same as and when required. File be closed and consigned to record. |
|||
| Ex. 09 | Purshis. P.O. DRT-I |
¶2
Mnt/-1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Roznama
- respondent
K R Thakur
Coram
AI extract
Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court