The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed off Original Application No. 357/2022 maintained by IDBI Bank against respondents, holding that the account was closed with no dues remaining payable.
Original Application disposed of; original documents returned to applicant bank; court fees refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 23.11. Sr. No |
2023 .28 |
OA No. 357/2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
||
| ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 357/2022 | |||
| IDBI Versu Sanja Mr.A. None The m 1. 2. 3. A. |
Bank ..Applicant s y Vitthalrao Jadhav ..Defendant/s S. Pathak - Advocate for the applicant-bank. for the defendant(s). atter is taken through Video Conference. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant-bank submits that the account has been upgraded. He requests for disposal of the matter. The counsel requests for return of the original documents and also refund of the court fees as per rules. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant-bank, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER As the account is closed and nothing remains to be paid the Original Application No.357/2022 stands disposed off. |
||
| B. | The original documents, if any filed be returned to the Authorised Officer of the applicant bank as per rules. |
||
| C. D. |
The court fees be refunded as per rules and as per the orders passed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. Consign the file to the Record Room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (OA No.357/2022) Page 1 of 1
IDBI Bank
Sanja Mr.A., Vitthalrao Jadhav, S. Pathak
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
