Allowed

State Bank Of India v. Pankaj So Ashok Gandhi

DRT23 Nov 2023MA/82/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing a securitisation application due to the death of the applicant's advocate who held the original documents. The Miscellaneous Application was allowed, restoring the original application and directing summons issuance.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay, restoration of original application, and direction to register the Miscellaneous Application.

State Bank Of India versus Pankaj So Ashok Gandhi — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2023)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

¶2

ORDER SHEET

¶3

	23.11. Sr. No	2023 .14 Diary No. 859/2023
Classific ation	No. of Exh.
		INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1971/2023 IN DIARY No.859/2023 State Bank of India ..Applicant Versus Pankaj Ashok Gandhi ..Respondent Mr. S.P. Talegaonkar – Advocate for the applicant. None for the respondent. The matter is taken through Video Conference.
		1. By this Interlocutory Application No.1971/2023 the counsel of the applicant seeks condonation of 21 days delay in filing the securitisation application. 2. In this matter the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the original documents were with the Advocate P.R. Wagh who had expired therefore the documents were not traceable. In the interest of justice this delay is condoned and MA be registered. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing.
		ORDER
		A. The Interlocutory Application No.1971/2023 for condonation of 2015 days delay stands allowed accordingly

¶4

[SBJ] ( Diary No.859/2023) Page 1 of 2

¶5

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

¶6

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

¶7

ORDER SHEET

¶8

Diary (SA) No.859/2023 stands allowed. A. The Registry is directed to register the Miscellaneous Application . B. The Miscellaneous Application No.82/2023 is allowed . The Original Application No.161/2015 be restored to its original position. C. The Claim Affidavit and the Original Documents are taken on record . D. The Registry is directed to issue summons to the defendants through Court Commissioner in the OA No.161/2015 and the matter be listed before him on 10^th January, 2023 for completion of pleadings. E. The MA No.82/2023 alongwith Diary No.859/2023 be consigned to the record room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

¶9

[SBJ] ( Diary No.859/2023) Page 2 of 2

State Bank Of India v. Pankaj So Ashok Gandhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State Bank Of India v. Pankaj So Ashok Gandhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Union Bank of India versus Sunar Dinkar Ingole

Bank of Maharashtra versus Mr Eknath Bhaurao Mahalkar

Bank of Maharashtra versus Mr Kachru Baban Mahalkar

State Bank of India versus M/S Mahakali Industries

Mr Arvind Kashiram Nangre versus Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited

Idbi Bank versus Sanjay Vitthalrao Jadhav