The applicant seeks the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Original Application stating that it has recovered the sum of Rs.1.68 crores in full and final satisfaction of the applicants claim. The learned counsel filed the additional affidavit stating that the court fees is paid by the applicant and therefore it is entitled for the refund of the court fees. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the Original Application on the next date. Permission granted

Sd/-

¶16

(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

Nidhi

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

¶19

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

ORDER SHEET

¶21

16.06.2023

¶22

Sr. No.5

¶23

classifi -cation	No. of Exh.	Union M/s. Meka Infras	OA No.303 of 2023 Bank of India Vs. tructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
		Ms Tejaswini Kaudallu i/ Advocates for the applicant None for defendants.	b M/s. Sagar & Sagar Asso. – .
	8	1. The learned counsel additional affidavit record. 2. Order in I.A. No.l234 3. In view of the order Original Application as withdrawn with no 4. The learned Registra fees to the applicant a	for the applicant has presented (exhibit-8), which is taken on of 2023 passed separately. passed in I.A. No.1234 of 2023, No.303 of 2023 stands dismissed order as to costs. r is directed to refund the court s per the Rules. Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

Nidhi

Union Bank of India (Corporation Bank) v. M/s. Meka Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief