Disposed

Union Bank of India v. Hilton Infrastructure & Ors.

DRT10 Jan 2023OA/30/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an interlocutory application seeking permission to withdraw an original application after the defendants paid the claim amount. The original application was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Original Application granted; Original Application dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.

Union Bank of India versus Hilton Infrastructure & Ors. — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2023)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

¶2

Sr. No.21

¶3

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.45 of 2023 In ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.30 of 2023

¶4

Union Bank of India … Applicant

¶5

Versus

¶6

M/s. Hilton Infrastructure & Ors. … Defendants

¶7

Ms Aparna Jagtap i/b Mrs Uma Fadia – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendants.

¶8

Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 10^th January 2023.

¶9

ORDER

¶10

The applicant submits that the defendants have made the payment of entire claim amount of ₹21,68,86,169.62/- and therefore, seeks the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Original Application. Permission granted.

¶11

Interlocutory Application No.45 of 2023 is allowed with no order as to costs.

¶12

Sd/-

¶13

(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

¶14

Radhika

¶15

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

¶16

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

¶17

ORDER SHEET

¶18

10.01.2023 Sr. No.21

¶19

classifi- cation	No. of Exh.	OANo.30 of 2023 Union Bank of India Vs M/s. Hilton Infrastructure & Ors.
		Ms Aparna Jagtap i/b Mrs Uma Fadia – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendants.
		1. Order in I.A. No.45 of 2023 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.45 of 2023, Original Application No.30 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
		3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules.
		Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

¶20

Radhika

Union Bank of India v. Hilton Infrastructure & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union Bank of India v. Hilton Infrastructure & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Shankar Rao versus Bharat Cooperative Bank Mumbai Limited

Sudhakar v Narvekar versus Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.

Bank of Baroda versus Raji Paresh Patel

Bank of India versus Kapil

Punjab National Bank versus Rajkumar Murarilal Varma

Gajanan Agro Industries versus Saraswat Cooperative Bank Limited