Tribunal dismissed an infructuous securitisation application after applicants conceded no amendment could be considered and did not press for relief regarding failed e-auction.
Securitisation Application dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.904
ORDER In SECURITISATION APPLICATION NO.214 of 2022
Mr. Sudhakar V. Narvekar & Ors. … Applicant
Versus
Cholamandalam Investment and … Defendant Finance Co. Ltd.
Mr Jitendra Chinchambekar – Advocate for the applicants.
Mr Alok Mishra – Advocate for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 21st December 2022
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
21.12.2022 Sr. No.904
| SA No.214 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mr. Sudhakar V. Narvekar & Ors. Vs. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. |
| Mr Jitendra Chinchambekar – Advocate for the applicants. Mr Alok Mishra – Advocate for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in Securitisation Application No.214 of 2022, | ||
| Interlocutory Application No.2841 of 2022 and | ||
| Interlocutory Application No.2842 of 2022 passed separately. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Mr. Sudhakar V. Narvekar & Ors.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
