The applicant bank filed an OA for recovery of dues. The defendant deposited the overdue amount, upgrading the account status. The court disposed of the OA as withdrawn.
OA disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
PAGE No....
CASE No...
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE OROER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA126t22 17/07 t23 |
Appticantby ShriJ.B.Patet,Advocate Defendant isex-parte |
|
| TheCounselforAppticant-Bankhasfitedan AppticationlA1514/23 atongwith anAffidavitofShri SanjayMehta, ChiefManager.ltisstatedthatthe Applicant-BankhasfitedthepresentOAforrecovery ofRs.48,03,173.71andotherreliefsagainstthe Defendant.ltisfurtherstatedthatduringthe pendencyoftheOAtheDefendanthaddeposited the overdueamountandtheloanaccountofthe Defendantisnowupgradedandthedebtofthe DefendantisoutofNon-Performing AssetCategory. TheCounselforApplicant submitsthat theBank furtherpraysfor withdrawal of thepresentOA. |
||
| Consideringthe fact that theaccountofthe Defendanthasnowbeen upgraded and isoutofNPA categorysincehedepositedtheentireoverdue amount,thepresent0Astandsdisposedofas withdrawn.Recordbeconsignedto therecordroom. s/D sPa lcer ding |
Bank
Defendant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
