Magistrate's applications regarding Mediation/Alternative Dispute Resolution matters were dismissed for default due to the petitioner/dawn grantee's non-appearance and indicated lack of interest to proceed with the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MA/90/2023 IN TA/79/2021
Advocate Devayani learned counsel for the respondent No.1/applicant is present. None appears on behalf of the petitioner/defendant No.1 inspite of repeated call. The petitioner/defendant No.1 is continuously not appearing in this case to decide the MAs on merit. It appears that the petitioner/defendant No.1 is not interested to proceed with the case. Hence the MA.No.90/2023 and MA.No.92/2023 is dismissed for default.
Petitioner/Defendant No.1
Advocate Devayani learned counsel for the respondent No.1/applicant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
