Allowed

State Bank of India v. Govind Kamaji Waghmare

DRT21 Dec 2023MA/89/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal allowed the applicant bank's miscellaneous application seeking restoration of the original application dismissed for non-filing of the claim affidavit, directing registry to restore it to its original stage. The order was passed through video conferencing.

What did the court decide?

Misc. Application allowed; Original Application restored to original stage; File consigned to Record Room.

State Bank of India versus Govind Kamaji Waghmare — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2023)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

¶2

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

¶3

ORDER SHEET

¶4

21.12.2023

¶5

Sr.	No.1	5 MA No.89/ 2023
Classific ation	No. of Exh.
		MISC. APPLICAITON NO. 89 / 2023
		State Bank of India ..Applicant Versus Govind Kamaji Waghmare .. Respondents Mr.K.D.Pande – Advocate for the applicant bank. None for the defendants The matter is taken through Hybrid. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to non-filing of CAOD, the Original Application no. 05/2018 was dismissed.
		2. The Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that inadvertently COAD is not filed and now filed herewith seeking permission to restore the Original Application and for taking the claim affidavit on record.
		3. The reasons given in the Misc. Application are not acceptable even then in the interest of justice, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER
		A. Misc. Application No.89/2023 is allowed. B. Registry is directed to restore the Original Application no. 05/2018 to its original stage. C. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site.
		(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

¶6

[APK]

State Bank of India v. Govind Kamaji Waghmare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State Bank of India v. Govind Kamaji Waghmare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Rohidas Gajaram Satpute versus Axis Bank

Chandrakant Ramdas Giri versus Osmanabad Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd.

Bank of Maharashtra versus Vijay Pandharinath Narode

Maharastra Gramin Bank versus Ramesh Govindrao Phulare

Smt Vimala Nirmalchand Mehta versus Punjab National Bank

State Bank of India versus Haribhau Kisan Kapse