Disposed
Hdfc Bank v. Shankar Lal Manchani
DRTMA/31/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶2
PAGE No
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| M31tzz 18t07/23 |
AppticantbyShriAbhishek Agrawat, Advocate Nonefor theDefendants |
|
| CounselfortheAppticantBank hasfitedanAffidavit ofShri AkarshJain,Manager(Law)on22109/21.ltis deposedthattheAppticant-Bankhasfited thepresent appticationforrecoveryofRs.1'1,14,079l- atongwith interestand costs againstthe Defendants.Hefurther deposedthatduringthependencyofthe0A Defendantshavesetttedtheaccountsbydepositing Rs.8,77.675.00towardsfuttandfinalsatisfaction of thedues.TheCounse[forAppticantBankfurther praysfor withdrawat of thepresentMA. ConsideringthesubmissionmadebytheCounselfor ApplicantthattheDefendantshave depositedthe entirecompromise amountofRs.8,77.675.00 towards fut[andfinalsetttementofthedues,thepresentMA standsdisposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbe consignedto therecordroom. slD 1n#fliwaseately Presidingofficer |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Bank
- respondent
Defendants
Coram
AI extract
Presiding Officer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court