Canara Bank v. Naib Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Application seeking correction of an order dated 19.01.2023 where the bank official's name was wrongly mentioned as Nand Lal Pahwa instead of Rohit Pahwa. The court directed the court master to make the correction and disposed of the matter.
What did the court decide?
Directed the court master to make the necessary correction in the original order regarding the name of the affidavit filer.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA 27/2023 IN OA NO.337/2022 CANARA BANK VS. NAIB SINGH
27.03.2023 Item No.75
Present: Sh. Randeep Singh, Counsel for the Applicant Bank.
This MA has been filed for correction of the order dated 19.01.2023. Canara Bank had filed OA No.337/2022, which was withdrawn on 19.01.2023. In the order dated 19.01.2023, the name of the bank official who had filed the affidavit has been wrongly mentioned as Nand Lal Pahwa instated of Rohit Pahwa.
File perused. The court master is directed to make necessary correction on the original order. Accordingly, the MA stands disposed of . File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Canara Bank
- other
Nand Lal Pahwa
- other
Rohit Pahwa
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court