An Applicant filed an MA for restoration of an appeal dismissed in default. The Respondent bank had no objection, and the court restored the appeal to its original number and disposed of the MA.
MA allowed; SA No.159/2021 restored to original number; MA disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA/25/2023 IN SA No.159/2021 Tirath Ram Badri Nath vs. SBI
24.03.2023 Item No.65
Present: Sh.Vineet Sachdeva, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.Vivek Verma, Counsel for respondent bank.
Heard on MA No.25/2023 for restoration of SA No.159/2021, which was dismissed in default on 16.02.2023 and the present MA was filed on 03.03.2023.
Mr.Vivek Verma, counsel for respondent bank has made a statement at the bar he has no objection in case the MA is allowed. I order accordingly. MA is hereby allowed and disposed of .
SA No.159/2021 is ordered to be restored to its original number.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
Manoj
Tirath Ram Badri Nath
SBI
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
