Sham Sunder v. Union Bank of India
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/18/2023 SHAM SUNDER Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA
20.03.2023 Item No.59
Present: Ms.Sonal, proxy for Sh.Satish Jaswal, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.YP Singla, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr.YP Singla, counsel for respondent bank has made a statement at the bar that bank has not affected the earlier auction and cancel the sale notice. In view of this, present SA has been rendered infructuous. The same is hereby dismissed. File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
SHAM SUNDER
- respondent
UNION BANK OF INDIA
Coram
(A S Narang)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court