Dismissed
Manti Devi v. Canara Bank
DRTCA/4/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a Chamber Appeal challenging an order directed against non-deposit of court fee and removal of defects in an S. application under SARFAESI.
What did the court decide?
Chamber Appeal dismissed due to non-deposit of deficit court fee and non-removal of defects.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Office action taken with data
¶2
| Date o~rder or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
|---|---|
| Chamber Appeal 4 of 2022 | |
| 15.02.2023 | The present Chamber Appeal has been filed against the order of Registrar on 28.6.2022 in the S. application registered as Sl no. 159 of 2022 and Diary no. 530 of 2022. Ithas been informed that Id. counsel for the SARFAESI applicant has not deposited deficit court fee of Rs.27,7501- and not removed the defects pointed out vide order dated 10.6.2022. Ld. counsel for the appellant submits that the S. applicant neither the borrower and nor the guarantor but admittedly she is legal representative of the borrower Kaaleshwari Devi. She shall be treated as borrower. Accordingly have not pointed out any discrepancy in report of the Registrar in question. Hence Chamber Appeal is dismissed. Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. v Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav Presiding Officer |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Kaleeswari Devi
Coram
AI extract
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court