Dismissed
Kapildev Yadav v. Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/136/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Order dismissing the Section 17 application as infructuous since the SARFAESI action had been withdrawn by the respondent bank and vacating any interim order.
What did the court decide?
SA dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| • |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA | |
|---|---|---|
| Date of order or proceeding |
Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with data |
| SA 136of 2022 | ||
| 14.2.2023 | Ithas been informed by Ld. counsel for the respondent bank that the entire SARFAESI action has been withdrawn. Hence the S. application has become infructuous. Accordingly the S. application is dismissed as infructuous with all pending lAs if any. Interim order is vacated, if any. |
|
| Consign the record. | ||
| Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. Patna V (Kaushalendra Yadav~ Presiding Officer |
¶2
j)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Coram
AI extract
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court