HDFC Bank Ltd., as appellant, sought recovery through a chamber appeal before the DRT Aurangabad. The appellant failed to appear, claiming lack of interest in prosecuting. The tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
The chamber appeal (No. 12/2023) was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
24.11.2023
| S | r. No. | 89 CA No.12/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh |
|
| C.A. No.12/2023 HDFC Bank Ltd. ..Applicant/s Versus M/s Uday Tractors & others ..Respondents None for the applicant(s) The matter is taken through Hybrid. 1. None appears for the applicant as such in the interest of justice matter re-notified for proper orders. 2. Today also none appears for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. Moreover, the contentions in the chamber appeal are not acceptable. 4. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing/Hybrid. ORDER |
||
| A. Chamber Appeal no. 12/2023 is dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK]
HDFC Bank Ltd.
M/s Uday Tractors & others
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
