This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN TI{E DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBLTNAL L
Present: A.H. Khan, Presiding Offi
Dated of order 21.9.2022
S.A. No.638 of 2022
SL No.87
Present:-
Counsel for the applicant Mr. Gyan Sineh Counsel for respondent-bank Ms. Usha Chawla
Counsel for the respondent-bank stated that the bid for the auction, therefore, IR prayed by the infructuous.
not received is rendered
Heard counsel for both the parties.
Perusal of records reveals that the applicant has sale notice and in pursuance of impugned sale notice, the has not received any bid, therefore, the present Securitization A on has become infructuous and is accordingly disposed of.
Let the file be consigned to records.
.H. Khan) siding Officer
Applicant
Respondent-bank
A.H. Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
