The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal of the Original Application after the parties reached an amicable settlement via payment of Rs. 2 crores by the defendants.
Withdrawal of Original Application No.290 of 2022 permitted; OA dismissed as withdrawn with refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.12
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1692 of 2022 In ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.290 of 2022
Union Bank of India
… Applicant
Versus
M/s. Krishna Metal & Allied Products … Defendants (I) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Mr Sanjay Upadhyay i/b M/s. K.D. Shukla & Co. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 8th December 2022.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
08.12.2022 Sr. No.12
OA No.290 of 2022
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Union Bank of India Vs. M/s. Krishna Metal & Allied Products (I) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. |
|---|---|---|
| Mr Sanjay Upadhyay i/b M/s. K.D. Shukla & Co. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 7 | 1. Order in I.A. No.1692 of 2022 passed separately. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant has presented additional affidavit (exhibit-7), which is taken on record. 3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1692 of 2022, Original Application No.290 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
|
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Union Bank of India
M/s. Krishna Metal & Allied Products (I) Pvt. Ltd.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
