Application challenging sale notice was disposed of as withdrawn due to settlement between applicant and respondent bank.
Application disposed of as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.A. 213 of 2022 22.07.2022
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2022
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K. Presiding Officer
SARFAESI APPLICATION No. 213 of 2022
M/s.Four Seasons Hotel, Represented by its partner, Mr.N.Sambath, 211, Chetty Street, Pondicherry – 605 001. ….Applicant
Vs.
The Authorised Officer, State Bank of India Stressed Assets Recovery Branch, 2nd Floor, Indian Red Cross Buildings, No.32, Montieth Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. ….Respondent
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s.R.K.M.Suresh & D.Adhitya. Counsel for Respondent : M/s.Shivakumar and Suresh.
ORDER
bank has been duly complied with by applicant and the account is fully settled. Ld. counsel for applicant prayed for permission to withdraw the SA in view of the settlement.
2
S.A. 213 of 2022 22.07.2022
(Dictated to PS, transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in Open Court, on this the 22nd day of July, 2022)
Sd/- (GANAPATHI K.R.K) PRESIDING OFFICER
M/s.Four Seasons Hotel
The Authorised Officer, State Bank of India
Shri Ganapathi K.R.K
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
