Hdfc Bank v. Sahib Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
The arrears possession order filed by the bank was dismissed as withdrawn after the parties compromised the matter for Rs.7,50,000/-. Petitioner obtained refund of court fees.
What did the court decide?
Discharged court fees; set aside OA as withdrawn.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/1329/2022 HDFC BANK Vs SAHIB RAM
07.09.2022 Item No.24
Present: Sh. JS Sehgal, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Parampreet Singh Kahlon, and has made a statement at the bar that the parties have compromised the matter for sum of Rs.7,50,000/- and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn . Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MG
Parties & counsel
- applicant
HDFC BANK
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court