Ms Bhr Enterprises v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
In SA 98 of 2022, the Debt Recovery Tribunal at Patna noted the applicant's request for time to deposit the balance amount pending execution of the decree.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Date of order or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with data |
|---|---|---|
| SA 98 of 2022 Ms BHR Enterprises Vs State Bank of India Present Shri Neeraj Kumar Ld. Counsel for the applicant Shri S.K.Singh Ld. Counsel for the respondent. |
||
| 07.09.2022 | Patna V (Kaushalendra Yadav_j_ Presiding Officer Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is ready to deposit the balance amount and has made some payment during the pendency of SA, hence wants time. Ld. counsel for the respondent has filed reply against the IA. Put up on 18.11.2022 for hearing. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. |
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to time for depositing the balance amount in an execution application.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ms BHR Enterprises
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court