Poonam Chopra v. Icici Bank Limited
DRTMA/44/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Incomplete order sheet document containing fragmented references to a case involving monetary obligations, with no substantive decision, reasoning, or party details extractable.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
PAGE No
¶2
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE | REMARK DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER |
|---|---|
| w..44/2022 | |
| 2211.2022 | or-ilnflToTdIilqfr mqqrrg 3rfu.mTwRerot |
| 3ffirieo6irqtt-fidimqsft rrfrsgd3ID{fi1sqRardr 3a-nfqo.DrnE,2\q3silq-ilR.1, qeff,R,gqRrrftdlenqeq+tnr&tr |
|
| 1. sr]-{rqerCS{Tftfarrtrfr-{utrpq oiffiqwriglr.ror I |
|
| 2. 3tTnffi3rB{fiTilTfrd6ltqp;r orTeYrfuqToo5.os2o22weiloffi-ooq, 3tcrqdo-flzlrTqTfurr+eifu+rqd GrftqGiltylo-rvTEr<o-rdgverr]-{o.qer dRrft-qr6j5.102022rlc,60,00,000/_ (ercoru)rqt"rrrToal+dqdd,qra 10,65,000/-(cqdl(st<rorwr)wt sl-iq-fiqeTTSqrrrore-6r,fufl{rftr o)qroHtrdqrlqf,qeTf{crfi1s12.22 doE'.qr6-{trTsrrdrB,fo-gorlTa-{fi Eiqtq. 1tormoil-iq-f,verdergtu o) {fi+.rir-SfoqrrrcnqErot"wrerD-ovq drrqerwRerddni,r.cl t |
|
| 3. g{fr3nw{qEtqnprq-qror,) oofqqtRdDrd.,rr.\ +,rrr5)trf),qr TtqT I 4.smrqrftGrDs-frTgRTonqfu(d ovdgVn-drqrqsTtfufs"p_"., |
¶5
t
¶6
PAGE No
¶7
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶8
CASE No
¶9
| DATE DESCRIPTIONOFTHEORDER |
RETIARK |
|---|---|
| detrfwryNoTril{fiqeTftqfR-dftlq dfi'{rRrqqr znrid3NTqr-d{6Tq-qfu Tdqd_fraRIarnrr35,oo,oool-(q-fi-q 'drq)trdrdgos3rr+Rrd{RTGqI .il{iof{€qfil{l.rir.ft,gqol{qorq etld<oqeTfAr$l.frqerlTfilor{r<r( .rfrdl |
|
| 5. fr-oatusm-rqrfr3lfus-fi1tsqq fuorrrqrfuqqTilfi3rrA-normrwql.]t .r${rRT60,00,000l-(eiaaru)sqi ilrm{o-{tqT "tEdT B,fqwvf,.4rfr orffflffiroToqr{BfuQ-€Td{ftdrT -'r<rsqrfrdos\s.Srfrflqrr{rtBt |
|
| 6.fisorrJtfusniqoseigt{l qs$T3rlt)-f,{vrd3rTerTffioosog.zz orgrf,qordgqft-ttotsto.2o22,lh |
|
| 60,00,000l-(wearq)sqq'rqT6-{ f{qr.nlrBoqfuct-qo13f,48q-1qrs ukognono-Gofvrdcntfr-d'tr{ 3r-iEoqao)eqqf{qTqr'fl;qTqR-dq sfuoBr |
|
| 7. rFd{{oq3tr}EoqeTofonqt rrgoeri'<ncfr+rq,ig\3flafl [d<toos |
|
| og2o22ch qftull {] ld,fiqlq,{',1 2o,6s,oool-(fiqats*noawr)out qqro-GoffufRderq{fiETfurrfi 15.10.2022th,Ptq rr1?tto,os,oool-(({l olgt-crdEqR)sq-d\rsE.-d-qerqf}ot rzs"fr{rdqrqt+R-dqqT6Gofsflq |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court