Ms Ganpat Pannalal v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Tribunal considered whether applicants could deposit costs with the N.P.A. bank account after bank denied receipt of funds deposited via departmental registry. Matter reserved for order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
GASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sAt76,1 ll,ll ll |
ShritJditMandirelta.AdrlitrtltcAppliearrts ShriJBPatel,Advlbrthcl{csponclent I.Onthct'cclucstol'thc thisIr-rattclistakcrlLrP No.2257122datedI5/I rcspondent. pcrclircctiottol' thellcsl llcsponricrtt (ottttscI ,,.tltl l,<br> |
22 fllcd b1thc hc lirr' I 2.Applicant('ottllsclb1 inritirlg ilttcllti()llIlt pala-12ol'thc otdctelatcclU+lU2lstrbtltits ihot,rperorderol'this'l ribunalthe applicants havc alrcady depositcdRs.10.000.-rrithI)l{'l tlar'.labalprtratrtl Ilas lrlstlitpllloirehetltlte BanLtttdcpositlts.l.i)0'()0()- rriththcllrrtil" buttheIlankhasdcniedtorcccivcthcmoncy statingthat theaccountol'thcapplicantshas clcclaredasN.P.A.'fl-rclcltllcanl()l'llll cltlllloI bcclcpositcduitll thcN.l',.,'\rlcc()tlllt' 'lhe'realiclthcap;llicarltshavcdcpositedtltc amoLrntthrotrghclemaucldralibeltlre' Itc'gistty ol'thisl't'ibr,rnalon[ 5rI0t22rrithnlcnltllot trlkingprool-ol'tltccostol.tlccottl, 3.ApplicantCounscllirrthclsubmitslhatthc clcmanclclLalihas plepaledtolrattclovct'thc lLesponclcntCot-ttlsclbttthct'clitsetotceeirc thcdcmattcltllali:tittittg thlitthetltlrliliirs prepaleclwithwrol)-qllanlcthctealicrthu' clemanddratihad beensenttotlreapplicants uilhadirectiorrtovltliclittcthesltnlcitltlte naurcol.r'ight;lcrsort, 4.ApplicantCot-tnscllirlthct'sLibntiLs thaIth applicantshave preparcdanothcr dcmarld dral inthcnamcol'Statc[Jank ol.lndiir I]hollrtlit 'lrrritl-tl[('rritti:uI iui( |
PAGE No
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicants are required to deposit costs with the N.P.A. account of the bank given that the bank denied receipt of funds deposited through departmental registry.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicants
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
Ram Niwas J
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court