Allowed
Allahabad Bank v. M/S S.R Enterprises
DRTMA/173/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
RDT Patna allowed a MA seeking withdrawal of a recovery certificate after compromise and receipt of amount; RC dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
MA allowed; RC dismissed as withdrawn; documents to be returned to applicant bank.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Office action taken with data
¶2
Date of order or proceeding
¶3
22.11.2022
¶4
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court
¶5
| MA 173 of 2022 |
|---|
¶6
| This Miscellaneous Application has been filed by applicant seeking permission to withdraw the RC no. 605 of2019 inOA no.21 of2019. |
|---|
| It is stated therein that the matter has been compromised and the compromise amount has been received by the applicant bank. This application is supported by an affidavit of Shri Bharat Bhushan Bharti, Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Patna which substantiates the contents of the application. Under the circumstances, the MA stands allowed and RC no.60S of 2019 is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Original documents, if any lying with the Tribunal be returned to the applicant bank as per rule. Consigned the record. |
| A Copy of order be sent to the parties and Ld. Recovery Officer for necessary action. |
| Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer |
¶7
j)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Indian Bank, Patna
Coram
AI extract
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court