Vivek Bhaurao Dethe v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRAT Mumbai registrar declined the registration of Misc. Appeal D. No. 1362/2025 because the appellant failed to remove registry objections despite sufficient opportunity, presuming lack of interest.
What did the court decide?
Misc. Appeal D. No. 1362/2025 is hereby declined for Registration.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Misc. Appeal D. No. 1362/2025
Vivek Bhaurao Dethe
Appellant
-Vs-
Canara Bank
Respondents
Misc. Appeal D. No. 1362/2025 is listed on today’s board (10.04.2026) before the Ld. Registrar at 11.30 AM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
Adv. Bharti Suvarna appeared for the Appellant when matter is called out.
This Misc. Appeal D. No. 1362/2025 was filed on 27.08.2025 and certain objections were raised by the Registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a miscellaneous appeal should be registered when the appellant failed to comply with defects despite sufficient opportunity.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vivek Bhaurao Dethe
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
Registrar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 271090013622025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court