Anklesh Jakhu Patel v. Central Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar recorded appellant's absence and failure to comply with compliance defects after sufficient opportunity, thereby declining registration of the misc. appeal under DRAT Rules, 1994.
What did the court decide?
Misc. Appeal D. No. 1933/2025 is declined for registration.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Misc. Appeal D. No. 1933/2025
Anklesh Jakhu Patel
Appellant
-Vs-
Central Bank Of India
Respondents
Misc. Appeal D. No. 1933/2025 is listed on today’s board (13.04.2026) before the Ld. Registrar at 11.30 AM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
None appeared for the Appellant when matter is called out.
This Misc. Appeal D. No. 1933/2025 was filed on 01.12.2025 and certain objections were raised by the Registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anklesh Jakhu Patel
- respondent
Central Bank Of India
Coram
Registrar DRAT Mumbai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 271090019332025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court