Ravina Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Rep by its Managing Director a Sreenivasalu v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal dismissed the waiver application and rejected the appeal due to non-compliance with a conditional order dated 22.6.2026.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 16th day of July, 2026
PRESENT: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 701 of 2026 in AIR (SA) 1213 of 2026
(arising out of IA No. 843 of 2026 SA No.260 of 2026 on the file of DRT-II, Chennai)
Between Ravina Healthcare P Ltd., Represented by Managing Director, Dr. A. Sreenivasulu, No.99, Poonamallee High Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai – 600 095
….. Appellant
And Union Bank of India, Asset Recovery Branch, Chennai Represented by its Authorized Officer, No. 168, Second Floor, Linghi Chetty Street, Parrys Corner, Chennai – 600 001
….. Respondent
Counsel for Appellant: M/s. R. Thiagarajan Counsel for Respondent: M/s. N. Venkateswaran
Page 1 of 2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal and waiver application should be dismissed due to non-compliance with a conditional order.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ravina Healthcare P Ltd.
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court