Muddam Sunil Kumar v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Order declining to register seven cases listed under 'Defect' due to absence of advocates and non-receipt of hard copies at the Registry.
What did the court decide?
Cases listed under the heading Defect (Sl. No. 9 to 17) are declined to Register.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Registry bench Order dated 06/04/2026
F. No. 4/07/2020
It is found from the e-drt portal that some cases are filed through online but the hard copies of the same have not been received till date by the department. For this purpose, some of those cases were listed today. E-mails were sent to the concerned advocates for appearance before the registry bench today, failing which the cases were to be declined by the Registry. But, no one appears before the Registry bench today to file the hard copies. Hence, the cases listed under the heading of Defect from Sl. No. 9 to 17 are decline to Registrar.
REGISTRAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court