The matter was listed for hearing but the appellants did not appear and no representation was filed. The Regular Appeal Diary was dismissed for default, and pending interim applications were also dismissed.
Dismissal of Regular Appeal Diary No. 1575/2025 and dismissal of pending interim applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma, Chairperson
I.A. No. 732/2025 (WoD) In
Regular Appeal Diary No. 1575/2025
Between
Bhikhaji Khodaji Vaghela & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. Meenaben Dilipkumar Patel & Ors. …Respondent/s
-: Order dated: 15/07/2026: -
Present:
Ms. Nalini Lodha, Advocate for Respondent No.4
No representation for the Appellants and other Respondents despite repeated calls.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Respondent No.4 which is taken on record.
It appears that the Appellants is not keen on prosecuting the matter.
Accordingly, the Regular Appeal Diary No. 1575/2025 is dismissed for default.
All pending, I.As., if any, stand dismissed.
Sd/Chairperson
Psa-16
1
Bhikhaji Khodaji Vaghela & Ors.
Meenaben Dilipkumar Patel & Ors.
Vivek Bharti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
