Appeal for withdrawal of pre-deposit dismissed for default due to non-prosecution by the appellant, who failed to appear despite repeated calls.
None; appeal dismissed for default and pending IAs dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI
Present: Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma, Chairperson I.A. Diary No. 1060/2026 (Withdrawal of Amount)
Misc. Appeal No. 130/2024
Between
Gruh Suvidha Through Its Prop. Sri. Shantilala … Appellant/s Kunjulala Rathi & Ors. V/s.
Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.
…Respondent/s
-: Order dated: 15/07/2026: -
Present:
Mr. V. Deshpande, i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for
Respondent.
1
the accrued interest in favour of Appellant No. 1. He would further submit that during the pendency of the Appeal, the mandatory predeposit cannot be refunded/released. Therefore, the application has to be disallowed.
Sd/Chairperson
Psa-01
2
Gruh Suvidha Through Its Prop. Sri. Shantilala & Ors.
Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.
Vivek Bharti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
