During hearing Misc. Application No. 56/2024 for restoration, the Appellant failed to file a representation or prosecute the matter after repeated calls by the court, leading to an order defaulting the application.
The Misc. Application No. 56/2024 is dismissed for default. All pending interim applications stand dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma, Chairperson Misc. Application No. 56/2024 (Restoration)
In (Regular Appeal on Diary No. 521/2024-Disposed of)
Between Suraj Biotech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. State Bank of India …Respondent/s Mr. Rony P.J. Advocate for Respondent. -: Order dated: 20/04/2026: - There is no representation for the Appellants despite repeated calls.
It seems that the Appellant is not keen on prosecuting the matter.
Accordingly, the M.A. No. 56/2024 stands dismissed for default. All pending I.As. if any stand dismissed.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-17
1
Suraj Biotech Pvt. Ltd.
State Bank of India
Vivek Bharti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
