K.Kunhimohammed v. Federal Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, dismissed an application for waiver of pre-deposit because the appellant failed to deposit 25% of the appeal amount by the stipulated deadline. Consequently, the appeal arising out of an Order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Ernakulam, was rejected.
What did the court decide?
Application for waiver of pre-deposit dismissed; appeal rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 10th Day of August, 2026
PRESENT; HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 333/2026 (Waiver) in AIR 2835/2025 (Arising out of O.A.No.429/2015 on the file of DRT-I, Ernakulam)
Between
K. Kunhimohammed, S/o. Aboobacker, Kakkodi House, Aravankara, Valluambram P.O., Malappuram District – 673 642.
Represented by his Power of Attorney Hasjas Mohammed K, S/o. Kunhimohammed Kalathingal, Kakkodi House, Aravankara New Bazaar, Velluvambram P.O., Malappuram District, Kerala Pin – 673 642.
… Appellant
And
- The Chief Manager, The Federal Bank Ltd., Malappuram Branch, Bava’s Arcade, Down Hill P.O., Malappuram – 676 519.
- M. M. Sabida, W/o. K. Kunhimohammed, Kakkodi House, Aravankara, Valluambram P.O., Malappuram District – 673 642.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be rejected for non-compliance with the pre-deposit order.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Kunhimohammed
- respondent
The Chief Manager, The Federal Bank Ltd.
- respondent
M. M. Sabida
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 331090028352025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court