P Harikrishnan v. the South Indian Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Chennai dismissed a waiver application and rejected the consequential appeal because the appellant failed to obtain or produce an order from the High Court to support his claim, resulting in a finding of non-compliance.
What did the court decide?
The waiver application was dismissed for non-compliance and the appeal was rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 11th day of August, 2026
PRESENT: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 441/2026 (Waiver) in AIR (SA) 80/2026
(arising out of S.A.No.838/2024 on the file of DRT-III, Chennai)
Between
Mr. P. Harikrishnan S/o. Parasuraman, Prop. Of M/s. P. Harikrishnan No. 90, Panjupettai Big Street, Kanchipuram – 631 502.
….. Appellant
And M/s. The South Indian Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Chief Manager, Regional Office at: No. 43, Ground Floor, Hameedia Centre, Haddows Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006.
….. Respondent
Counsel for Appellant: M/s. P. Venugopal Counsel for Respondent: M/s. Deepa Harigovind
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the appeal which arose out of a rejected waiver application for public hearing due to non-compliance.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. P. Harikrishnan S/o. Parasuraman, Prop. Of M/s. P. Harikrishnan
- respondent
M/s. The South Indian Bank Ltd.
Coram
G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 331090000802026
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court