Garbled directional order dismissing an application for waiver due to non-deposit of ordered amount and rejecting the appeal in a debt recovery matter.
Waiver application dismissed; Appeal rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 21st of January, 2026
PRESENT: Hon’ble Mr. Justice G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 548/2024 (Waiver) in A.IR:1053/2024
(SA 218/2018 on the file of DRT-I, Ernakulam)
BETWEEN
K.A. Gopinath, S/o. K.C. Balakrishnan Nair, Gayathri, P.O. Kuthiravattom, Kozhikode – 673 016
…Appellant
AND
….Respondents
Counsel for Appellant Counsel for Bank
: M/s. Kamachi D : M/s. Geetha
1
ORDER
Despite giving sufficient time, the amount as already ordered in the Waiver Application is not deposited in its entirety. Therefore, Waiver Application in IA 548/2024 is dismissed. Consequently, the Appeal in A.IR:1053/2024 is rejected. All pending IAs, if any, stand closed.
[Dictated to Athistamani, PS, in open court, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me this 21st of January, 2026]
[ Justice G. Chandrasekharan] CHAIRPERSON
2
K.A. Gopinath
The Manager, The Calicut Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd.
G. Chandrasekharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
