K a Gopinath v. the Calicut Co. Operative Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal dismissed a waiver application and consequently rejected the appeal because the specified amount was not deposited in full despite being given sufficient time.
What did the court decide?
Waiver application in IA 550/2024 dismissed; Appeal in A.IR:1054/2024 rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 21st of January, 2026
PRESENT: Hon’ble Mr. Justice G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 550/2024 (Waiver) in A.IR:1054/2024
(SA 144/2019 on the file of DRT-I, Ernakulam)
BETWEEN
K. A. Gopinath, S/o. K. C. Balakrishnan Nair, Gayathri, P.O. Kuthiravattom, Kozhikode – 673 016.
…Appellant
AND 1.The Calicut Co-Operative Urban Bank Limited, Kallai Road, Kozhikode – 673 002, Represented by the Authorized Officer, Rajendra Kumar, S/o. Narayanan Nair, Manager, Recovery Section. 2. O. Rajesh Kumar, S/o. O. Sreedharan, “Sarasa Villa”, P.O. Civil Station, Kozhikode – 673 020. Counsel for Appellant : M/s. Kamachi D Counsel for Bank : M/s. N. Geetha
….Respondents
1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. A. Gopinath
- respondent
The Calicut Co-Operative Urban Bank Limited
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 331090010542024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court