Vanshika Kamlesh Lodaya v. Motilal Oswal Finance Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Registrar of DRAT Mumbai declined registration of Appeal No. 616/2024 because the appellant failed to remove registry objections despite sufficient opportunity, presuming lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
What did the court decide?
Declined registration of Appeal (Diary) No. 616/2024
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Appeal (Diary) No. 616/2024
Vanshika Kamlesh Lodaya
Appellants
-Vs-
Motilal Oswal Finance Ltd. & Ors.
Respondents
Appeal (Diary) No. 616/2024 is listed on today’s board (08.07.2025) before the Ld. Registrar at 11.30 AM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
None appeared for the Appellant when matter is called out.
This Appeal (Diary) No. 616/2024 was filed on 19.03.2024 and certain objections were raised by the Registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vanshika Kamlesh Lodaya
- respondent
Motilal Oswal Finance Ltd. & Ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court