Hdfc Bank v. Sandeep Harshvardhan Sahastrabudhhe
Case brief
What is this about?
In Appeal (Diary) No. 1954/2024, the Registrar dismissed the appeal filed by HDFC Bank Ltd. against non-compliance with Registry objections. The court declined registration under DRAT Rules Rule 6(4), presuming the appellant lost interest.
What did the court decide?
Appeal (Diary) No. 1954/2024 declined for registration.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Appeal (Diary) No. 1954/2024
HDFC Bank Ltd.
Appellants
-Vs-
Sandeep Harshavardhan Sahasrabudhe & Ors.
Respondents
Appeal (Diary) No. 1954/2024 is listed on today’s board (08.07.2025) before the Ld. Registrar at 11.30 AM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
None appeared for the Appellant when matter is called out.
This Appeal (Diary) No. 1954/2024 was filed on 11.09.2024 and certain objections were raised by the Registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to register an appeal filed for non-compliance with Registry objections despite sufficient opportunity given.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
HDFC Bank Ltd.
- respondent
Sandeep Harshavardhan Sahasrabudhe & Ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 271090019542024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court