Shine P Jacobs v. South Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an application for condoning delay and rejected the pending appeal as infructuous because the main special appeal was already dismissed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 8th day of April, 2025
PRESENT: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 498/2024 (Delay)
In
AIR (SA) 835/2024
(Arising out of IA 156/2024 in SA 49/2022 on the file of DRT - II, Ernakulam)
Between
Shine P.Jacob, S/o. P.M.Jacob, Poovannammoottil House, T.B. Junction, Punalur P.O., Kollam – 691 305 … Appellant
And
- The Authorised Officer/Chief Manager, The South Indian Bank, Regional Office, YWCA Building, MG Road, Statue, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 014.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shine P.Jacob
- respondent
The Authorised Officer/Chief Manager, The South Indian Bank
- respondent
The Branch Manager, The South Indian Bank
- respondent
The Chairman, The South Indian Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 331090008352024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court