Salil Bhalchandra Nanal v. Idfc Bank First Class
Case brief
What is this about?
The Registrar of DRAT Mumbai declined registration of a Miscellaneous Appeal filed by Salil Bhalchandra Nanal due to non-compliance with registry objections and non-appearance of the appellant.
What did the court decide?
Misc. Appeal D. No. 192112024 declined for registration.
What the court decided
DeFts Regoyery Appq[qte f,fiQunal, Mumbai
Misc. Appeal D. No. 192112024
Salil Bhalchandra Nanal
.......Appellant
-Vs-
IDFC Bank First Ltd. & Ors.
Respondents
Misc. Appeal D. No. 192112024 is listed on today's board(23.07.2025) before the Ld. Registrar at 11.30 AM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
None appeared for the Appellant when matter is called out.
This Misc. Appeal D. No. 192112024 was filed on 08.09.2024 and certain objections were raised by the Registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Miscellaneous Appeal should be registered when the appellant fails to comply with registry objections and does not appear.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Salil Bhalchandra Nanal
- respondent
IDFC Bank First Ltd. & Ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 271090019212024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court