The DRAT Mumbai Registrar declined to register Misc. Appeal D. No. 777t2025 under Rule 6(a) of the DRAT Rules, 1994, as the appellant failed to remove defects despite sufficient opportunity, presuming lack of interest.
The Misc. Appeal D. No. 777t2025 is declined for registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-fl.Nc.L
PgbtsRecovery Appellate Tribunal'Mumbai
Misc. APPealD' No' 77712025
Vipul KanubhaiGadhesariYa & Ors'
... ... .ApPettant
-Vs-
A.O. lclclBank
ResPondents
Misc. AppealD. No. 777t2025is listed on today's board (25'07'2025)before the Ld. Registrarat 11.30 AM for compliance/removalof defects' The said Board is displayedin Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the NoticeBoardof DRAT Mumbai'
Adv. sachinKaikini appeared for the Appellant when matter is called out'
This Misc.Appeal D. No. 777t2025was filed on 20'05'2025and certain objectionswereraised by the Registryfor compliance/removalof defects' However,despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defectstill date.
Therefore,it is presumed that,the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
ln view of theabove & under the provisions of Sub Rule (a) of Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure)Rules,1994 the Misc. Appeal D. No. 777t2025 is hereby declined for Registration.
+.J
Date: 25.07.2025
Registrar DRAT Mumbai
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Misc. Appeal D. No. 777t2025 should be registered despite the appellant failing to remove defects.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vipul Kanubhai Gadhesari & Ors
A.O. Ltdcl Bank
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
