Rita J Thakker v. Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
This Registration appeal filed before the DRAT Mumbai was declined for registration because the appellant failed to comply with objections raised by the Registry to remove defects, leading the court to presume disinterest.
What did the court decide?
Misc. Appeal D.No.234012024 deemed for registration.
What the court decided
Misc.APPeal D. No' 234012024
... ....APPellant
Rita JThakker
-Vs-
HindujaLeylandAnd Finance Ltd' & Ors'
ResPondents
Misc.AppealD.No.2s4ot2o24islistedontoday'sboard(11.08.2025)before theLd.Registraratll.30AMfcrcompliance/remova]ofdefects.Thesaid BoardisdisplayedinPublicNoticeonthewebsiteofDRT/DRATandalsoon the NoticeBoard of DRAT Mumbai'
Noneappeared for the Appellantwhen matter is called out'
ThisMisc.AppealD.No.234ol2o24wasfiledon24.10.2024andcertain objectionswereraisedbytheRegistryforcompliance/removalofdefects. However,despite sufficientopportuiity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defectstill date'
Therefore,itispresumedthat,thaappellantisnotinterestedinpursuingwith the matter.
ln viewof the above & under the provisions of sub Rule (a) of Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure)Rulls, 1994 the Ufisc'eppealD' No' 2340t2024is hereby declinedfor Registration'
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rita Thakker
- respondent
Hinduja Leyland And Finance Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 271090023402024
- Bench
- Prabhupada Panda
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court