Poornima Enterprises v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Registrar, in an appellant's absence, disallowed the registration of a miscellaneous appeal filed before the DRAT Mumbai due to the appellant's failure to comply with registry directions regarding objections and defects raised earlier.
What did the court decide?
The miscellaneous appeal No. 1656/2023 is declined for registration and is not admitted.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery AppellateTribunal. Mumbai
Misc. APPealD. No' 165612023
Poornima EnterPrises& Ors'
.. ... .Appellant
-Vs-
Bank Of Baroda& Ors'
ResPondents
Misc. AppealD. No. 1656t2023 is listed on today's board(11'08'2025)before the Ld. Registraral 11.30 AM for compliance/removalof defects' Thesaid Board is displayedin Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the NoticeBoard of DRAT Mumbai'
None appearedfor the Appellantwhen matter is called out.
This Misc. AppealD. No. 1656t2023was filed on 09.09'2023 and certain objectionswereraisedby the Registryfor compliance/removalof defects' However, despitesufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defectstill date.
Therefore,it is presumed that,the appellantis not interested in pursuing with the matter.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this non-appearance of the appellant justifies the court to treat the appeal as concerned and disqualify the appeal?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Poornima EnterPrises & Ors.
- respondent
Bank Of Baroda & Ors.
Coram
KJ
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court