P S Palani v. Indian Bank and Anr.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A(S.A):36/2016
P.S.Palani V/S Indian Bank & Others
06/10/2025
Heard Learned Counsel for Appellant and Auction Purchaser in full.
Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank seeks time on the ground that the OTS proposal has been submitted by Appellant. Even the Appellant has not stated anything about the OTS proposal and sought adjournment on the ground of pendency of any OTS proposal. Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank was already heard in an extensive manner and the matter is posted for reporting settlement or for conclusion of arguments. Therefore, the arguments are concluded. Orders reserved.
If Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank wants to make any submissions, he is free to file Written Submissions within a period of one week from today.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.S. Palani
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court