The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant was absent despite the matter being kept under the caption for dismissal. All pending incidental applications were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 17th of February, 2025
PRESENT: Hon’ble Mr. Justice G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
R.A (SA): 130/2014
(SA No. 149/2014 on the file of DRT, Bangalore)
Between
M. Manjunath, S/o. Late R. Mariappa, No.306/B, 6th Main, 8th Cross, West of Chord Road Industrial Town, Mahaganapathi Nagar, Rajaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 001.
… Appellant
And
ORDER
No representation for Appellant today.
This matter is posted today for dismissal as Appellant was absent on previous hearing, i.e. 28.01.2025.
To give an opportunity to Appellant, matter is kept under the caption ‘for dismissal”. In spite of that Appellant evinced no interest in prosecuting the Appeal. Therefore, RA(SA):130/2014 is dismissed for nonprosecution. All pending IAs, if any, stand closed.
[Dictated to Athistamani, PS, in open court, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me this 17th of February, 2025]
[ Justice G. Chandrasekharan] CHAIRPERSON
M. Manjunath
State Bank of India
G. Chandrasekharan
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
