Messers Hari Fashions v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai permitted the appellants to withdraw their waiver application under IA 14/2022. Consequently, the court dismissed the application, leading to the rejection of the connected stay application AIR(SA) 231/2021.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the waiver application (IA 14/2022) granted; Application dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 14th Day of February, 2025
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 14/2022(Waiver) In
AIR(SA) 231/2021 (Arising out of IA 2619/2021 inSA 592/2021 on the file of DRT, Coimbatore)
Between
- M/s. Hari Fashions Proprietor Mr N. Sundarrajan No. 1/509/5, Bharathi Estate ‘Behind Vinayagar Colony Kumarapalayam – 638 183
- Mr. N. Sundarrajan S/o Nagarajan No. 1/509/5, Bharathi Estate Behind Vinayagar Colony Kumarapalayam – 638 183.
- S. Karthiyayani No. 1/509/5, Bharathi Estate ‘Behind Vinayagar Colony Kumarapalayam – 638 183.
…Appellants
And
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Hari Fashions Proprietor Mr N. Sundarrajan and others
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 331090002312021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court