A Ravishankar v. The Ao Repco Home Finance Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order dismissing the appellant's appeal due to failure to comply with the Tribunal's order mandating a 25% pre-deposit within the prescribed period, rendering the statutory requirement unfulfilled.
What did the court decide?
Application for waiver dismissed; Appeal rejected due to non-compliance with pre-deposit order.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 15th day of April, 2025
PRESENT: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 631/2024 (Waiver)
In
AIR (SA) 1210/2024
(Arising out of IA 883/2024 in SA 302/2024 on the file of DRT - III, Chennai)
Between
A.Ravishankar, S/o. Arjunan, Plot No.24 & 25, Block B, G3, Ground Floor, Swetha Apartment, Sri Rajeswari Nagar, Madhanandapuram, Porur, Chennai – 600 116. … Appellant
And
The Authorised Officer, Repco Home Finance Limited, Corporate Office at 3rd Floor, Alexander Square, New No.2, Old No. 34 & 35, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. Registered Office at: Repco Towers, No.33, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. …Respondent Counsel for Appellant : Mr.M.Abubakar Counsel for Respondent : Mr.A.Ilangovan
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant's appeal should be dismissed due to non-compliance with the statutory deposit order.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.Ravishankar
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Repco Home Finance Limited
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 331090012102024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court