Priya Enterpries v. Electronica Finance Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellant failed to appear to address registry objections regarding defects in a Miscellaneous Application. The DRAT declined registration under rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules, 1994, presuming lack of interest.
What did the court decide?
Misc. Application D. No. 221012024 declined for registration.
What the court decided
Debts Rgcovery Appellate Tribuna!, Mumbai
Misc. Application D. No. 221012024
Priya Enterprises and Anr.
... .. Appellant
-Vs-
Electronica Finance Ltd. & Anr.
Respondents
Misc. Application D. No. 221012024 is listed on today's board (10.10.2025) before the Ld. Registrar at 11.30 AM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
None appeared for the Appellant when matter is called out.
This Misc. Application D. No. 221012024 was filed on 09.10.2024 and certain objections were raised by the Registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Miscellaneous Application should be registered when the appellant fails to address registry objections after full opportunity despite non-appearance.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Priya Enterprises and Anr.
- respondent
Electronica Finance Ltd. & Anr.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court