Balaji Atmaram Panchal v. Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Registrar declined registration of a regular appeal because the appellant failed to comply with registry objections to remove defects within the given opportunity.
What did the court decide?
Regular Appeal D. No. 551/2023 is declined for Registration.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. Mumbai
Regular Appeal D. No. 551/2023
Balaji Atmaram Panchai
Appellant
-Vs-
Bank Of India
Respondents
Regular Appeal D. No. 551/2023 is listed on today's board (08.10.2025) before the Ld. Registrar at 11.30 AM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
None appeared for the Appellant when matter is called out.
This Regular Appeal D. No. 551/2023 was filed on 19.04.2023 and certain objections were raised by the Registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a regular appeal can be registered when the appellant failed to remove defects despite sufficient opportunity.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Balaji Atmaram Panchai
- respondent
Bank Of India
Coram
Registrar DRAT Mumbai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 271090005512023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court